Ziegler et al 2010a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 13:20, 21 January 2021

2021-01-21T13:20:50Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 302452940 to Ziegler et al 2010a

2020-10-14T12:46:32Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 302452940 to Ziegler et al 2010a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Flow size based congestion control has the potential to improve user perceived Web performance due to the heavy tailed characteristic of file size distributio..."

2020-10-14T12:46:29Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Flow size based congestion control has the potential to improve user perceived Web performance due to the heavy tailed characteristic of file size distributio..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Flow size based congestion control has the potential to improve user perceived Web performance due to the heavy tailed characteristic of file size distributions in the Web. After discussing the benefits and drawbacks of transport protocol and router based solutions for size based congestion control, guidelines for algorithm design are developed. Using these guidelines we find that size based congestion control needs to incorporate TCP models to avoid undesirable user incentives. Based on this insight we specify enhancements to TCP featuring size based congestion control and provide arguments for parameter settings. It is shown by simulation that our modified version of TCP significantly outperforms NewReno from a user perspective in scenarios using realistic models for Web traffic and topologies with multiple congested links.

Document type: Part of book or chapter of book

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_302452940-beopen624-4024-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-24693-0_57.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-24693-0_57.pdf]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:20, 21 January 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Flow size based congestion control has the potential to improve user perceived Web performance due to the heavy tailed characteristic of file size distributions in the Web. After discussing the benefits and drawbacks of transport protocol and router based solutions for size based congestion control, guidelines for algorithm design are developed. Using these guidelines we find that size based congestion control needs to incorporate TCP models to avoid undesirable user incentives. Based on this insight we specify enhancements to TCP featuring size based congestion control and provide arguments for parameter settings. It is shown by simulation that our modified version of TCP significantly outperforms NewReno from a user perspective in scenarios using realistic models for Web traffic and topologies with multiple congested links.		Flow size based congestion control has the potential to improve user perceived Web performance due to the heavy tailed characteristic of file size distributions in the Web. After discussing the benefits and drawbacks of transport protocol and router based solutions for size based congestion control, guidelines for algorithm design are developed. Using these guidelines we find that size based congestion control needs to incorporate TCP models to avoid undesirable user incentives. Based on this insight we specify enhancements to TCP featuring size based congestion control and provide arguments for parameter settings. It is shown by simulation that our modified version of TCP significantly outperforms NewReno from a user perspective in scenarios using realistic models for Web traffic and topologies with multiple congested links.
−
−	~~Document type: Part of book or chapter of book~~
−
−	~~== Full document ==~~
−	~~<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_302452940-beopen624-4024-document.pdf</pdf>~~


Line 15:		Line 10:

	* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-24693-0_57.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-24693-0_57.pdf]		* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-24693-0_57.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-24693-0_57.pdf]
		+
		+	* [http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-24693-0_57 http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-24693-0_57],
		+	: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24693-0_57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24693-0_57]
		+
		+	* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-24693-0_57 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-24693-0_57],
		+	: [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/networking/networking2004.html#ZieglerTH04 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/networking/networking2004.html#ZieglerTH04],
		+	: [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ziegler_et_al_2010a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ziegler_et_al_2010a],
		+	: [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-24693-0_57.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-540-24693-0_57.pdf],
		+	: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1584197317 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1584197317]

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:46, 14 October 2020
(No difference)