Sanz-Ramos et al 2025a - Revision history

Msanz at 05:15, 14 November 2025

2025-11-14T05:15:21Z

Msanz at 05:12, 14 November 2025

2025-11-14T05:12:38Z

Msanz at 05:09, 14 November 2025

2025-11-14T05:09:10Z

Msanz at 05:06, 14 November 2025

2025-11-14T05:06:47Z

Msanz at 05:00, 14 November 2025

2025-11-14T05:00:56Z

Msanz at 05:00, 14 November 2025

2025-11-14T05:00:03Z

Msanz at 14:41, 13 November 2025

2025-11-13T14:41:24Z

Msanz at 14:38, 13 November 2025

2025-11-13T14:38:26Z

Msanz at 14:38, 13 November 2025

2025-11-13T14:38:14Z

Msanz at 14:38, 13 November 2025

2025-11-13T14:38:03Z

@@ Line 546: / Line 546: @@
 {| style="width: 80%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;"
 |-
-|  style="text-align: center;width: 100%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_4004_Fig_18.png|1600px]]
+|  style="text-align: center;width: 80%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_8124_Fig_17a.png|1600px]]
 |}
 <span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Fig. 17. Hydrodynamic results on surface 1 h after the simulation starts: (a) depths; (b) velocities.'''</span>

@@ Line 431: / Line 431: @@
 {| style="width: 80%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;"
 |-
-|  style="text-align: center;width: 100%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_2256_Fig_13a.png|1600px]]
+|  style="text-align: center;width: 80%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_7596_Fig_13a.png|1600px]]
 |-
-|  style="text-align: center;width: 100%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_3033_Fig_13b.png|1600px]]
+|  style="text-align: center;"|(a)
 |}
 <span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Fig. 13. Results of maximums at the end of the simulation: (a) flow depth; (b) flow velocity (modulus).'''</span>

@@ Line 294: / Line 294: @@
 |  style="text-align: center;"|
 |}
 {| style="width: 80%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em;border-collapse: collapse;"
-−
-{| style="width: 80%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;"
 |-
-|  style="text-align: center;width: 100%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_8234_Fig_7a.png|1600px]]
+|  style="text-align: center;width: 40%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_7344_Fig_7c.png|1600px]]
 |-
-|  style="text-align: center;width: 100%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_7705_Fig_7b.png|1600px]]
+|  style="text-align: center;"|(c)
 |}
 <span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Fig. 7. Results at the end of the simulation: (a) flow depth; (b) flow velocity (modulus); (c) flow velocity in the X direction; (d) flow velocity in the Y direction.'''</span>

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 14 November 2025
Line 281:		Line 281:

	The results of the numerical models, SWMM and Iber, can be shown directly in QGIS. In this case, only the 2D results of Iber are available since none sewer network has been simulated through SWMM. Fig. 7 shows the map of flow depth and velocity at the end of the simulation. As expected, the inlet subtracts water from the model surface, affecting the hydrodynamics near the inlet location. The flow accelerates when it approaches to the inlet (Fig. 7b), especially in the X direction (Fig. 7c) while the velocity in the Y direction is almost null except near the inlet.		The results of the numerical models, SWMM and Iber, can be shown directly in QGIS. In this case, only the 2D results of Iber are available since none sewer network has been simulated through SWMM. Fig. 7 shows the map of flow depth and velocity at the end of the simulation. As expected, the inlet subtracts water from the model surface, affecting the hydrodynamics near the inlet location. The flow accelerates when it approaches to the inlet (Fig. 7b), especially in the X direction (Fig. 7c) while the velocity in the Y direction is almost null except near the inlet.
		+
		+	{\| style="width: 80%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em;border-collapse: collapse;"
		+	\|-
		+	\| style="text-align: center;width: 40%;"\|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_6546_Fig_7a.png\|1600px]]
		+	\| style="text-align: center;width: 5%;"\|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_8202_Fig_7aa.png\|1600px]]
		+	\| style="text-align: center;width: 40%;"\|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_4592_Fig_7b.png\|1600px]]
		+	\| style="text-align: center;width: 5%;"\|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_7013_Fig_7bb.png\|1600px]]
		+	\|-
		+	\| style="text-align: center;"\|(a)
		+	\| style="text-align: center;"\|
		+	\| style="text-align: center;"\|(b)
		+	\| style="text-align: center;"\|
		+	\|}

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 ==Resumen==
-Los sistemas de drenaje urbano se enfrentan a retos cada vez mayores debido al cambio climático, el crecimiento urbano y la necesidad de una gestión del agua más sostenible. Para abordar estos problemas, el proyecto Digital DRAIN ha desarrollado una herramienta que integra diversos modelos en un entorno SIG para analizar el rendimiento de los urban sistemas de drenaje. Esta herramienta permite evaluar tanto el caudal como la contaminación del agua, además de facilitar el diseño de soluciones sostenibles y estrategias de adaptación. Implementada como complemento de QGIS, IberGIS ofrece un marco accesible para mejorar la gestión del agua urbana y aumentar la resiliencia ante inundaciones e impactos ambientales.
+Los sistemas de drenaje urbano se enfrentan a retos cada vez mayores debido al cambio climático, el crecimiento urbano y la necesidad de una gestión del agua más sostenible. Para abordar estos problemas, el proyecto Digital DRAIN ha desarrollado una herramienta que integra diversos modelos en un entorno SIG para analizar el rendimiento de los urban sistemas de drenaje. Esta herramienta permite evaluar tanto el caudal como la contaminación del agua, además de facilitar el diseño de soluciones sostenibles y estrategias de adaptación. Implementada como complemento de QGIS, IberGIS ofrece un marco accesible para mejorar la gestión del agua urbana y aumentar la resiliencia ante inundaciones e impactos ambientales. Este documento es una guía de usaurio para introducir al usuario en el manejo de IberGIS.
 '''Palabras clave''': drenaje urbano, simulación 1D/2D, Iber-SWMM, QGIS

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 ==Abstract==
-Urban drainage systems are facing increasing challenges due to climate change, urban growth, and the need for more sustainable water management. To address these issues, the Digital DRAIN project has developed a tool that integrates different models within a GIS environment to analyse the performance of urban drainage systems. The tool helps assess both water flows and pollution, while also supporting the design of sustainable solutions and adaptation strategies. Delivered as the QGIS plugin IberGIS, it provides an accessible framework to improve urban water management and enhance resilience against floods and environmental impacts.
+Urban drainage systems are facing increasing challenges due to climate change, urban growth, and the need for more sustainable water management. To address these issues, the Digital DRAIN project has developed a tool that integrates different models within a GIS environment to analyse the performance of urban drainage systems. The tool helps assess both water flows and pollution, while also supporting the design of sustainable solutions and adaptation strategies. Delivered as the QGIS plugin IberGIS, it provides an accessible framework to improve urban water management and enhance resilience against floods and environmental impacts. This document is a user's guide to introduce the user how to use IberGIS.
 '''Keywords''': urban drainage, 1D/2D modelling, Iber-SWMM, QGIS

@@ Line 515: / Line 515: @@
 ===3.3.6 Run configuration===
-Once the simulation ends, accept loading the results of the simulation and, then, visualize them at 1 h of simulation. Fig. 18 shows the map of water depth and flow velocity (modulus) on the surface (results of Iber), and how the flow is transported over the streets mainly to the NE direction (where the outlet conditions are implemented). Considerable water accumulation is produced in five to nine locations (Fig. 18a) due to topographical depressions and the no consideration of outlet conditions (e.g., at southern part of the model).
+Once the simulation ends, accept loading the results of the simulation and, then, visualize them at 1 h of simulation. Fig. 17 shows the map of water depth and flow velocity (modulus) on the surface (results of Iber), and how the flow is transported over the streets mainly to the NE direction (where the outlet conditions are implemented). Considerable water accumulation is produced in five to nine locations (Fig. 18a) due to topographical depressions and the no consideration of outlet conditions (e.g., at southern part of the model).
 {| style="width: 80%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;"
@@ Line 521: / Line 521: @@
 |  style="text-align: center;width: 100%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_4004_Fig_18.png|1600px]]
 |}
-<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Fig. 18. Hydrodynamic results on surface 1 h after the simulation starts: (a) depths; (b) velocities.'''</span>
+<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Fig. 17. Hydrodynamic results on surface 1 h after the simulation starts: (a) depths; (b) velocities.'''</span>
-We can also check the Report summary of SWMM results. Fig. 19 shows an example for node depths, node inflows, link flows and outfall loading. Junction J60 presents a maximum depth of 3.55 m; thus, this node is under pressure and the flow goes from the sewer network to the street (this is one of the causes of water accumulation there, see Fig. 18a). In Node subcharge option we can observe that this node is working in pressurized flow for more than 2 hours.
+We can also check the Report summary of SWMM results. Fig. 18 shows an example for node depths, node inflows, link flows and outfall loading. Junction J60 presents a maximum depth of 3.55 m; thus, this node is under pressure and the flow goes from the sewer network to the street (this is one of the causes of water accumulation there, see Fig. 18a). In Node subcharge option we can observe that this node is working in pressurized flow for more than 2 hours.
 The outfall that spills the maximum discharge is O1, located at NE, with a peak discharge above 0.06 m3/s. This is because the sewer network mainly drains into this direction, and the flow in the conduits tends to accumulate in such direction.
@@ Line 529: / Line 529: @@
 {| style="width: 80%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;"
 |-
-|  style="text-align: center;width: 100%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_7749_Fig_19.png|1600px]]
+|  style="text-align: center;width: 25%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_7003_Fig_19a.png|1600px]]
 |}
-<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Fig. 19. Hydrodynamic results in the sewer network (Summary report): (a) node depths; (b) node inflow; (c) link flow; (d) outfall loading.'''</span>
+<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Fig. 18. Hydrodynamic results in the sewer network (Summary report): (a) node depths; (b) node inflow; (c) link flow; (d) outfall loading.'''</span>
 ==Funding==

@@ Line 225: / Line 225: @@
 {| style="width: 80%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;"
 |-
-|  style="text-align: center;width: 35%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_8408_Fig_4c.png|1600px]]
+|  style="text-align: center;width: 40%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_8408_Fig_4c.png|1600px]]
 |  style="text-align: center;width: 45%;"|[[File:Sanz-Ramos_et_al_2025a_2187_Fig_4d.png|1600px]]
 |-