Rollins et al 2024a - Revision history

http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Rollins_et_al_2024a Rollins et al 2024a - Revision history 2026-05-11T04:58:45Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Rollins_et_al_2024a&diff=301841&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 634512610 to Rollins et al 2024a 2024-06-07T11:27:26Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_634512610" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 634512610">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 634512610</a> to <a href="/public/Rollins_et_al_2024a" title="Rollins et al 2024a">Rollins et al 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:27, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Rollins_et_al_2024a&diff=301840&oldid=prev JSanchez at 11:27, 7 June 2024 2024-06-07T11:27:19Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:27, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In 2022, a new set of probabilistic shear wave velocity (𝑉𝑆) based liquefaction triggering curves was developed for  gravelly soil by Rollins et al., using a dataset of 96 liquefaction and 78 no liquefaction case histories from 17 earthquakes in seven countries. Although these curves provide liquefaction assessment based on direct field performance, they suffer from the fact that there are relatively few case histories for high 𝐶𝑆𝑅 and high 𝑉𝑆 values to define the shape of the upper branch of the triggering curves. Thus, we made shear wave velocity measurements at three sites in Valdez, Alaska where liquefaction did not occur in the Mw  9.2 1964 Great Alaska earthquake. The Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) technique was used to develop several median Vs profiles at each site that account for uncertainty in the experimental dispersion data and inversion parameterizations. 𝑉𝑆-based liquefaction evaluations were then made at each site, using the 𝑉𝑆 profiles derived from each solution. Results from previous Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DPT) tests were then used in selecting the most reasonable velocity interpretation. Based on this VS profile, the layer most likely to liquefy was selected and used to define 𝑉𝑆1 and 𝐶𝑆𝑅7.5 at the middle of this critical layer, obtaining three points of no liquefaction, that could change the shape of the upper branch of the existing VS-based liquefaction triggering curves. These preliminary results suggest that it might be necessary to shift the triggering curves to the left or steepen their slope to provide better agreement with observed performance.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In 2022, a new set of probabilistic shear wave velocity (𝑉𝑆) based liquefaction triggering curves was developed for  gravelly soil by Rollins et al., using a dataset of 96 liquefaction and 78 no liquefaction case histories from 17 earthquakes in seven countries. Although these curves provide liquefaction assessment based on direct field performance, they suffer from the fact that there are relatively few case histories for high 𝐶𝑆𝑅 and high 𝑉𝑆 values to define the shape of the upper branch of the triggering curves. Thus, we made shear wave velocity measurements at three sites in Valdez, Alaska where liquefaction did not occur in the Mw  9.2 1964 Great Alaska earthquake. The Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) technique was used to develop several median Vs profiles at each site that account for uncertainty in the experimental dispersion data and inversion parameterizations. 𝑉𝑆-based liquefaction evaluations were then made at each site, using the 𝑉𝑆 profiles derived from each solution. Results from previous Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DPT) tests were then used in selecting the most reasonable velocity interpretation. Based on this VS profile, the layer most likely to liquefy was selected and used to define 𝑉𝑆1 and 𝐶𝑆𝑅7.5 at the middle of this critical layer, obtaining three points of no liquefaction, that could change the shape of the upper branch of the existing VS-based liquefaction triggering curves. These preliminary results suggest that it might be necessary to shift the triggering curves to the left or steepen their slope to provide better agreement with observed performance.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_634512610159.pdf</pdf></ins></div></td></tr>  </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Rollins_et_al_2024a&diff=301838&oldid=prev JSanchez at 11:27, 7 June 2024 2024-06-07T11:27:18Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:27, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">                                </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In 2022, a new set of probabilistic shear wave velocity (𝑉𝑆) based liquefaction triggering curves was developed for  gravelly soil by Rollins et al., using a dataset of 96 liquefaction and 78 no liquefaction case histories from 17 earthquakes in seven countries. Although these curves provide liquefaction assessment based on direct field performance, they suffer from the fact that there are relatively few case histories for high 𝐶𝑆𝑅 and high 𝑉𝑆 values to define the shape of the upper branch of the triggering curves. Thus, we made shear wave velocity measurements at three sites in Valdez, Alaska where liquefaction did not occur in the Mw  9.2 1964 Great Alaska earthquake. The Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) technique was used to develop several median Vs profiles at each site that account for uncertainty in the experimental dispersion data and inversion parameterizations. 𝑉𝑆-based liquefaction evaluations were then made at each site, using the 𝑉𝑆 profiles derived from each solution. Results from previous Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DPT) tests were then used in selecting the most reasonable velocity interpretation. Based on this VS profile, the layer most likely to liquefy was selected and used to define 𝑉𝑆1 and 𝐶𝑆𝑅7.5 at the middle of this critical layer, obtaining three points of no liquefaction, that could change the shape of the upper branch of the existing VS-based liquefaction triggering curves. These preliminary results suggest that it might be necessary to shift the triggering curves to the left or steepen their slope to provide better agreement with observed performance.</ins></div></td></tr>  </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Rollins_et_al_2024a&diff=301837&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2024-06-07T11:27:16Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez