R. Curtis 2023b - Revision history

http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=R._Curtis_2023b R. Curtis 2023b - Revision history 2026-05-11T11:34:03Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=R._Curtis_2023b&diff=284503&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 117712077 to R. Curtis 2023b 2023-10-03T10:01:46Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_117712077" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 117712077">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 117712077</a> to <a href="/public/R._Curtis_2023b" title="R. Curtis 2023b">R. Curtis 2023b</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:01, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=R._Curtis_2023b&diff=284472&oldid=prev JSanchez at 09:58, 3 October 2023 2023-10-03T09:58:51Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:58, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The concept of a draft international project specification (DIPS) has long been under consideration in relevant fib Task Groups, - even before the framework Standard, ISO 22966 (Execution of concrete structures) was published (2009). However, the quality requirements of ISO 22966 were developed from the product quality inspection principles of the Eurocodes and ISO 9001:2000; and the author has explained why these principles cannot be applied directly to contract works. Furthermore, these principles do not demand the necessary level of high-performance concreting and supervision to produce defect-free structures and the 100 plus year service life which Owners expect.  The original ISO 9001:1987 was a simple, contractually effective model quality system specification which “aimed primarily at preventing nonconformity,” (the fundamental purpose of quality assurance). Its most powerful element was ‘process control’ (including ‘special processes’), and it demanded that all processes which could adversely affect quality must be addressed by effective documented preventive procedures in the Contractor’s Project Quality Plan (PQP). The Contractor had to document exactly how he would perform each (special) concreting process and then demonstrate that his proposed procedures worked.  Since 2000, this powerful combination of mandatory quality planning requirements has been removed from most specifications for concrete works; but this is precisely what needs to be restored if Owners’ and Designers’ durability expectations are to be consistently achieved.  The author now proposes an amended draft version of the International Project Specification, - hoping that it will soon be used on a trial basis on selected construction contracts for reinforced and prestressed concrete bridgeworks in China, Australia, United States and Europe.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The concept of a draft international project specification (DIPS) has long been under consideration in relevant fib Task Groups, - even before the framework Standard, ISO 22966 (Execution of concrete structures) was published (2009). However, the quality requirements of ISO 22966 were developed from the product quality inspection principles of the Eurocodes and ISO 9001:2000; and the author has explained why these principles cannot be applied directly to contract works. Furthermore, these principles do not demand the necessary level of high-performance concreting and supervision to produce defect-free structures and the 100 plus year service life which Owners expect.  The original ISO 9001:1987 was a simple, contractually effective model quality system specification which “aimed primarily at preventing nonconformity,” (the fundamental purpose of quality assurance). Its most powerful element was ‘process control’ (including ‘special processes’), and it demanded that all processes which could adversely affect quality must be addressed by effective documented preventive procedures in the Contractor’s Project Quality Plan (PQP). The Contractor had to document exactly how he would perform each (special) concreting process and then demonstrate that his proposed procedures worked.  Since 2000, this powerful combination of mandatory quality planning requirements has been removed from most specifications for concrete works; but this is precisely what needs to be restored if Owners’ and Designers’ durability expectations are to be consistently achieved.  The author now proposes an amended draft version of the International Project Specification, - hoping that it will soon be used on a trial basis on selected construction contracts for reinforced and prestressed concrete bridgeworks in China, Australia, United States and Europe.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_11771207774.pdf</pdf></ins></div></td></tr>  </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=R._Curtis_2023b&diff=284470&oldid=prev JSanchez at 09:58, 3 October 2023 2023-10-03T09:58:49Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:58, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">                                </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The concept of a draft international project specification (DIPS) has long been under consideration in relevant fib Task Groups, - even before the framework Standard, ISO 22966 (Execution of concrete structures) was published (2009). However, the quality requirements of ISO 22966 were developed from the product quality inspection principles of the Eurocodes and ISO 9001:2000; and the author has explained why these principles cannot be applied directly to contract works. Furthermore, these principles do not demand the necessary level of high-performance concreting and supervision to produce defect-free structures and the 100 plus year service life which Owners expect.  The original ISO 9001:1987 was a simple, contractually effective model quality system specification which “aimed primarily at preventing nonconformity,” (the fundamental purpose of quality assurance). Its most powerful element was ‘process control’ (including ‘special processes’), and it demanded that all processes which could adversely affect quality must be addressed by effective documented preventive procedures in the Contractor’s Project Quality Plan (PQP). The Contractor had to document exactly how he would perform each (special) concreting process and then demonstrate that his proposed procedures worked.  Since 2000, this powerful combination of mandatory quality planning requirements has been removed from most specifications for concrete works; but this is precisely what needs to be restored if Owners’ and Designers’ durability expectations are to be consistently achieved.  The author now proposes an amended draft version of the International Project Specification, - hoping that it will soon be used on a trial basis on selected construction contracts for reinforced and prestressed concrete bridgeworks in China, Australia, United States and Europe.</ins></div></td></tr>  </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=R._Curtis_2023b&diff=284469&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2023-10-03T09:58:48Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez