Montalvo 2017b - Revision history

Danielquer: Danielquer moved page Review Joan Joan 2017i to Montalvo 2017b

2017-12-13T15:11:18Z

Danielquer moved page Review Joan Joan 2017i to Montalvo 2017b

Danielquer at 14:18, 10 November 2017

2017-11-10T14:18:00Z

Danielquer at 14:17, 10 November 2017

2017-11-10T14:17:53Z

Joanjoanjoan at 15:52, 6 November 2017

2017-11-06T15:52:52Z

Joanjoanjoan: Joanjoanjoan moved page Draft Joan Joan 232007897 to Review Joan Joan 2017i

2017-11-06T15:52:25Z

Joanjoanjoan moved page Draft Joan Joan 232007897 to Review Joan Joan 2017i

Joanjoanjoan: Created page with "== Abstract ==
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px Helvetica}

During recent years, and under the pressure of increasing public deficits, se..."

2017-11-06T15:52:24Z

Created page with "== Abstract == p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px Helvetica} During recent years, and under the pressure of increasing public deficits, se..."

New page

== Abstract ==


p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px Helvetica}



During recent years, and under the pressure of increasing public deficits, several countries have decided to increases university fees to compensate the reduction in teaching subsidies financed by taxpayers. Perhaps the best-known case is the UK. In this paper we analyze a similar policy adopted in Catalonia. Tuition fees increased 66 per cent in the academic year 2012-13 to compensate the reduction of the public subsidy to finance the teaching activities of Catalan universities. Interestingly, the increase in fees was progressive meaning that the fee was a function of the income of the family. We analyze the distributional impact of this policy change. We show that this progressive tuition fee does not have as an effect a differential impact on the dropping out rate of students with different socioeconomic status.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 10 November 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Abstract ==		== Abstract ==
−

	<p>During recent years, and under the pressure of increasing public deficits, several countries have decided to increases university fees to compensate the reduction in teaching subsidies financed by taxpayers. Perhaps the best-known case is the UK. In this paper we analyze a similar policy adopted in Catalonia. Tuition fees increased 66 per cent in the academic year 2012-13 to compensate the reduction of the public subsidy to finance the teaching activities of Catalan universities. Interestingly, the increase in fees was progressive meaning that the fee was a function of the income of the family. We analyze the distributional impact of this policy change. We show that this progressive tuition fee does not have as an effect a differential impact on the dropping out rate of students with different socioeconomic status. </p>		<p>During recent years, and under the pressure of increasing public deficits, several countries have decided to increases university fees to compensate the reduction in teaching subsidies financed by taxpayers. Perhaps the best-known case is the UK. In this paper we analyze a similar policy adopted in Catalonia. Tuition fees increased 66 per cent in the academic year 2012-13 to compensate the reduction of the public subsidy to finance the teaching activities of Catalan universities. Interestingly, the increase in fees was progressive meaning that the fee was a function of the income of the family. We analyze the distributional impact of this policy change. We show that this progressive tuition fee does not have as an effect a differential impact on the dropping out rate of students with different socioeconomic status. </p>

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 10 November 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Abstract ==		== Abstract ==

−	~~<p>p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px Helvetica}</p>~~

	<p>During recent years, and under the pressure of increasing public deficits, several countries have decided to increases university fees to compensate the reduction in teaching subsidies financed by taxpayers. Perhaps the best-known case is the UK. In this paper we analyze a similar policy adopted in Catalonia. Tuition fees increased 66 per cent in the academic year 2012-13 to compensate the reduction of the public subsidy to finance the teaching activities of Catalan universities. Interestingly, the increase in fees was progressive meaning that the fee was a function of the income of the family. We analyze the distributional impact of this policy change. We show that this progressive tuition fee does not have as an effect a differential impact on the dropping out rate of students with different socioeconomic status. </p>		<p>During recent years, and under the pressure of increasing public deficits, several countries have decided to increases university fees to compensate the reduction in teaching subsidies financed by taxpayers. Perhaps the best-known case is the UK. In this paper we analyze a similar policy adopted in Catalonia. Tuition fees increased 66 per cent in the academic year 2012-13 to compensate the reduction of the public subsidy to finance the teaching activities of Catalan universities. Interestingly, the increase in fees was progressive meaning that the fee was a function of the income of the family. We analyze the distributional impact of this policy change. We show that this progressive tuition fee does not have as an effect a differential impact on the dropping out rate of students with different socioeconomic status. </p>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Abstract ==
-<p>
+<p>p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px Helvetica}</p>
 p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px Helvetica}
-−
 </p>
 <p>During recent years, and under the pressure of increasing public deficits, several countries have decided to increases university fees to compensate the reduction in teaching subsidies financed by taxpayers. Perhaps the best-known case is the UK. In this paper we analyze a similar policy adopted in Catalonia. Tuition fees increased 66 per cent in the academic year 2012-13 to compensate the reduction of the public subsidy to finance the teaching activities of Catalan universities. Interestingly, the increase in fees was progressive meaning that the fee was a function of the income of the family. We analyze the distributional impact of this policy change. We show that this progressive tuition fee does not have as an effect a differential impact on the dropping out rate of students with different socioeconomic status.&nbsp;</p>

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:11, 13 December 2017
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:52, 6 November 2017
(No difference)