<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Mercedes_et_al_2021a</id>
		<title>Mercedes et al 2021a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Mercedes_et_al_2021a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Mercedes_et_al_2021a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-13T21:23:05Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Mercedes_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=233159&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 417544259 to Mercedes et al 2021a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Mercedes_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=233159&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:32:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_417544259&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 417544259&quot;&gt;Draft Content 417544259&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Mercedes_et_al_2021a&quot; title=&quot;Mercedes et al 2021a&quot;&gt;Mercedes et al 2021a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:32, 30 November 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Mercedes_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=233158&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrices (FCRMs) are promising composite materials  for  the  retrofitting  and  reinforcement  of  existing  structures.  In  t...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Mercedes_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=233158&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:32:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrices (FCRMs) are promising composite materials  for  the  retrofitting  and  reinforcement  of  existing  structures.  In  t...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrices (FCRMs) are promising composite materials  for  the  retrofitting  and  reinforcement  of  existing  structures.  In  this  study,  vegetal meshes  consisting  of hemp  and  cotton  coated  with  epoxy  were  manufactured  and  combined with a cementitious matrix to strengthen masonry walls. A synthetic glass fibre mesh was also tested.  Several  walls  were  manufactured,  strengthened,  and  tested  under  cyclic  loading.  The results allow us to compare the performances of different mesh configurations in terms of size and materials.  All strengthening solutions significantly increased shear strength capacity and the ability to dissipate energy compared to unreinforced walls. Further, all strengthened walls exhibited multi-track pattern distributions and achieved distortion capacity improvements of up to 300%. Indicators of stiffness, energy dissipation, damping, residual deformation, and damage allow  us  to  compare  the  strengthening  performances  of  different  solutions.  The  vegetal solutions  provided  superior  efficiency  compared  to  the  glass-FRCM  strengthened  walls. Additionally, the use of a larger volume of vegetal fibres reduces the consumption of cement and can provide a sustainable solution. The main failure mechanism of the vegetal-FCRMs was debonding, which can be remedied by improvements to material interfaces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_417544259p559.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Días RLB. Vulnerabilidad y riesgo sísmico de edificios. Aplicación a entornos urbanos en zonas de amenaza alta y moderada. 2003:185–228.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Babaeidarabad S, De Caso F, Nanni A. Out-of-Plane Behavior of URM Walls Strengthened with Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix Composite. Asce 2014;549:1–11. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Balsamo  A,  Di  Ludovico  M,  Prota  A,  Manfredi  G.  Masonry  walls  strengthened  with  innovative composites. Am Concr Institute, ACI Spec Publ 2011;2:769–86.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Snoeck  D,  Smetryns  PA,  De  Belie  N.  Improved  multiple  cracking  and  autogenous  healing in cementitious materials by means of chemically-treated natural fibres. Biosyst Eng 2015;139:87–99. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.08.007.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Olivito RS, Cevallos OA, Carrozzini A. Development of durable cementitious composites using sisal and flax fabrics for reinforcement of masonry structures. Mater Des 2014;57:258–68. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.023.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] Cevallos  OA,  Olivito  RS.  Effects  of  fabric  parameters  on  the  tensile  behaviour  of sustainable cementitious composites. Compos Part B Eng 2014;69:256–66.  doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.004.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Menna C, Asprone D, Durante M, Zinno A, Balsamo A, Prota A. Structural behaviour of masonry panels strengthened with an innovative hemp fibre composite  grid. Constr Build Mater 2015;100:111–21. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.051.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Mercedes L, Gil L, Bernat-maso E. Mechanical performance of vegetal fabric reinforced  cementitious  matrix  (  FRCM  )  composites.  Constr  Build  Mater  2018;175:161–73.  doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.171.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] Bernat  E,  Gil  L,  Roca  P,  Escrig  C.  Experimental  and  analytical  study  of  TRM  strengthened brickwork walls under eccentric compressive loading. Constr Build Mater  2013;44:35–47. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.006.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] Comite tecnico AEN/CTN 80. Cales para contrucción-parte 1: Definiciones,  especificaciones y criterios de conformidad. 2016.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] UNE-EN  1015-11.  Métodos  de  ensayo  de  los  morteros  para  albañilería  -  Parte  11:  Determinación de la resistencia a flexión y a compresión del mortero endurecido, 2000, p. 14.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] EN 1504-3. EN 1504-3 Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete  structures - Definitions, requirements, quality control and evaluation of conformity - Part 3: Structural and non-structural repair. Http://WwwAenorEs/ 2005.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] Micelli F, Aiello MA. Residual tensile strength of dry and impregnated reinforcement fibres after exposure to alkaline environments. Compos Part B Eng 2016. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.005.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Donnini J, Corinaldesi V. Mechanical characterization of different FRCM systems for structural reinforcement. Constr Build Mater 2017;145:565–75.  doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.051.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] D’Antino  T,  Papanicolaou  C.  Mechanical  characterization  of  textile  reinforced inorganic-matrix composites. Compos Part B Eng 2017;127:78–91. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.034.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[16] American A, Standard N. Cyclic (Reversed) Load Test for Shear Resistance of Framed Walls for Buildings 1. Assembly n.d.:1–9.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[17] Ismail N, Ingham JM. In-plane and out-of-plane testing of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened  using  polymer  textile  reinforced  mortar.  Eng  Struct  2016;118:167–77.  doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.041.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[18] Su Q, Cai G, Cai H. Seismic behaviour of full-scale hollow bricks-infilled RC frames  under cyclic loads. Bull Earthq Eng 2016. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-0074-6.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[19] Hračov S, Pospíšil S, Garofano  A,  Urushadze  S.  In-plane  cyclic  behaviour  of  unfired  clay  and  earth  brick  walls  in  both  unstrengthened  and  strengthened  conditions.  Mater Struct 2015:3293–308. doi:10.1617/s11527-015-0720-5.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[20] Miranda L, Milosevic J, Bento R. Cyclic behaviour of stone masonry walls strengthened by grout injection. Mater Struct 2017;50:47. doi:10.1617/s11527-016-0911-8.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>