http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Marzouk%2A_Tschuchnigg_2024a Marzouk* Tschuchnigg 2024a - Revision history 2026-05-11T06:40:55Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Marzouk*_Tschuchnigg_2024a&diff=301255&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 756223793 to Marzouk* Tschuchnigg 2024a 2024-06-06T14:17:25Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_756223793" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 756223793">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 756223793</a> to <a href="/public/Marzouk*_Tschuchnigg_2024a" title="Marzouk* Tschuchnigg 2024a">Marzouk* Tschuchnigg 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 14:17, 6 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Marzouk*_Tschuchnigg_2024a&diff=301254&oldid=prev JSanchez at 14:17, 6 June 2024 2024-06-06T14:17:20Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 14:17, 6 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The success of numerical analysis relies on several factors, with one crucial aspect being the accurate determination of constitutive model parameters. Extracting these parameters directly from in-situ tests has several advantages, such as costeffectiveness and minimal soil disturbance. However, obtaining soil parameters directly from in-situ tests is not feasible, as empirical correlations are used to interpret them. An ongoing research project aims to create an automated parameter determination (APD) framework using a graph-based approach to determine constitutive model parameters from in-situ tests. The process involves using two spreadsheets as input: the first defines the parameters, while the second specifies the correlations used to compute them. The system then generates connections between the parameters and computes values for each one. The paper discusses the validation of the correlations database used by the system, which includes over 100 correlations for deriving parameters for various soil types. The framework determines parameters based on cone penetration tests (CPT), dilatometer tests (DMT), and in-situ shear wave velocity measurements. The system's output is compared to values interpreted from laboratory tests. To collect data for this validation, a web-based application &quot;Datamap&quot; was employed, which stores and categorizes geotechnical data. The validation process utilized data from the Norwegian GeoTest Sites (NGTS), specifically the NGTS-silt project. The parameters were calculated based on CPT, DMT, and in-situ shear wave velocity measurements. Ongoing research aims to evaluate the accuracy of the derived parameters and expand the system's capabilities to include additional in-situ tests</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The success of numerical analysis relies on several factors, with one crucial aspect being the accurate determination of constitutive model parameters. Extracting these parameters directly from in-situ tests has several advantages, such as costeffectiveness and minimal soil disturbance. However, obtaining soil parameters directly from in-situ tests is not feasible, as empirical correlations are used to interpret them. An ongoing research project aims to create an automated parameter determination (APD) framework using a graph-based approach to determine constitutive model parameters from in-situ tests. The process involves using two spreadsheets as input: the first defines the parameters, while the second specifies the correlations used to compute them. The system then generates connections between the parameters and computes values for each one. The paper discusses the validation of the correlations database used by the system, which includes over 100 correlations for deriving parameters for various soil types. The framework determines parameters based on cone penetration tests (CPT), dilatometer tests (DMT), and in-situ shear wave velocity measurements. The system's output is compared to values interpreted from laboratory tests. To collect data for this validation, a web-based application &quot;Datamap&quot; was employed, which stores and categorizes geotechnical data. The validation process utilized data from the Norwegian GeoTest Sites (NGTS), specifically the NGTS-silt project. The parameters were calculated based on CPT, DMT, and in-situ shear wave velocity measurements. Ongoing research aims to evaluate the accuracy of the derived parameters and expand the system's capabilities to include additional in-situ tests</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_75622379371.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:301252:newid:301254 --> </table> JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Marzouk*_Tschuchnigg_2024a&diff=301252&oldid=prev JSanchez at 14:17, 6 June 2024 2024-06-06T14:17:19Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 14:17, 6 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The success of numerical analysis relies on several factors, with one crucial aspect being the accurate determination of constitutive model parameters. Extracting these parameters directly from in-situ tests has several advantages, such as costeffectiveness and minimal soil disturbance. However, obtaining soil parameters directly from in-situ tests is not feasible, as empirical correlations are used to interpret them. An ongoing research project aims to create an automated parameter determination (APD) framework using a graph-based approach to determine constitutive model parameters from in-situ tests. The process involves using two spreadsheets as input: the first defines the parameters, while the second specifies the correlations used to compute them. The system then generates connections between the parameters and computes values for each one. The paper discusses the validation of the correlations database used by the system, which includes over 100 correlations for deriving parameters for various soil types. The framework determines parameters based on cone penetration tests (CPT), dilatometer tests (DMT), and in-situ shear wave velocity measurements. The system's output is compared to values interpreted from laboratory tests. To collect data for this validation, a web-based application &quot;Datamap&quot; was employed, which stores and categorizes geotechnical data. The validation process utilized data from the Norwegian GeoTest Sites (NGTS), specifically the NGTS-silt project. The parameters were calculated based on CPT, DMT, and in-situ shear wave velocity measurements. Ongoing research aims to evaluate the accuracy of the derived parameters and expand the system's capabilities to include additional in-situ tests</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:301251:newid:301252 --> </table> JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Marzouk*_Tschuchnigg_2024a&diff=301251&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2024-06-06T14:17:17Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez