Liu et al 2014b - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 11:06, 25 January 2021

2021-01-25T11:06:18Z

Scipediacontent at 15:22, 21 January 2021

2021-01-21T15:22:23Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 204093210 to Liu et al 2014b

2020-10-14T13:04:13Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 204093210 to Liu et al 2014b

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Abstract: Mathematical models may be used for design or evaluation of cathodic protection (CP) systems. This chapter provides a historical perspective and..."

2020-10-14T13:04:10Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Abstract: Mathematical models may be used for design or evaluation of cathodic protection (CP) systems. This chapter provides a historical perspective and..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Abstract: Mathematical models may be used for design or evaluation of cathodic protection (CP) systems. This chapter provides a historical perspective and a mathematical framework for the development of such models. The mathematical description accounts for calculation of both on- and off-potentials at arbitrarily located surfaces, thus making this approach attractive for simulation of external corrosion direct assessment (ECDA) methods. The approach also allows simulation of independent CP systems. Application of the model is presented for three cases: (a) enhancing interpretation of ECDA results in terms of the condition of the buried pipe; (b) simulating the detrimental influences of competing rectifier settings for crossing pipes protected by independent CP systems (e.g., rectifier wars); and (c) simulating the influence of coatings and coating holidays on the CP of above-ground tank bottoms.

Document type: Part of book or chapter of book

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_204093210-beopen702-3325-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9780857099266.1.85 http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9780857099266.1.85]

* [http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d3c/cab24ba59b39b1bc62d164c3fa03dd53eaf2.pdf http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d3c/cab24ba59b39b1bc62d164c3fa03dd53eaf2.pdf]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 25 January 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Abstract: Mathematical models may be used for design or evaluation of cathodic protection (CP) systems. This chapter provides a historical perspective and a mathematical framework for the development of such models. The mathematical description accounts for calculation of both on- and off-potentials at arbitrarily located surfaces, thus making this approach attractive for simulation of external corrosion direct assessment (ECDA) methods. The approach also allows simulation of independent CP systems. Application of the model is presented for three cases: (a) enhancing interpretation of ECDA results in terms of the condition of the buried pipe; (b) simulating the detrimental influences of competing rectifier settings for crossing pipes protected by independent CP systems (e.g., rectifier wars); and (c) simulating the influence of coatings and coating holidays on the CP of above-ground tank bottoms.		Abstract: Mathematical models may be used for design or evaluation of cathodic protection (CP) systems. This chapter provides a historical perspective and a mathematical framework for the development of such models. The mathematical description accounts for calculation of both on- and off-potentials at arbitrarily located surfaces, thus making this approach attractive for simulation of external corrosion direct assessment (ECDA) methods. The approach also allows simulation of independent CP systems. Application of the model is presented for three cases: (a) enhancing interpretation of ECDA results in terms of the condition of the buried pipe; (b) simulating the detrimental influences of competing rectifier settings for crossing pipes protected by independent CP systems (e.g., rectifier wars); and (c) simulating the influence of coatings and coating holidays on the CP of above-ground tank bottoms.
		+
		+	== Full document ==
		+	<pdf>Media:Liu_et_al_2014b-beopen1456-6743-document.pdf</pdf>

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 21 January 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Abstract: Mathematical models may be used for design or evaluation of cathodic protection (CP) systems. This chapter provides a historical perspective and a mathematical framework for the development of such models. The mathematical description accounts for calculation of both on- and off-potentials at arbitrarily located surfaces, thus making this approach attractive for simulation of external corrosion direct assessment (ECDA) methods. The approach also allows simulation of independent CP systems. Application of the model is presented for three cases: (a) enhancing interpretation of ECDA results in terms of the condition of the buried pipe; (b) simulating the detrimental influences of competing rectifier settings for crossing pipes protected by independent CP systems (e.g., rectifier wars); and (c) simulating the influence of coatings and coating holidays on the CP of above-ground tank bottoms.		Abstract: Mathematical models may be used for design or evaluation of cathodic protection (CP) systems. This chapter provides a historical perspective and a mathematical framework for the development of such models. The mathematical description accounts for calculation of both on- and off-potentials at arbitrarily located surfaces, thus making this approach attractive for simulation of external corrosion direct assessment (ECDA) methods. The approach also allows simulation of independent CP systems. Application of the model is presented for three cases: (a) enhancing interpretation of ECDA results in terms of the condition of the buried pipe; (b) simulating the detrimental influences of competing rectifier settings for crossing pipes protected by independent CP systems (e.g., rectifier wars); and (c) simulating the influence of coatings and coating holidays on the CP of above-ground tank bottoms.
−
−	~~Document type: Part of book or chapter of book~~
−
−	~~== Full document ==~~
−	~~<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_204093210-beopen702-3325-document.pdf</pdf>~~


Line 17:		Line 12:

	* [http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d3c/cab24ba59b39b1bc62d164c3fa03dd53eaf2.pdf http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d3c/cab24ba59b39b1bc62d164c3fa03dd53eaf2.pdf]		* [http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d3c/cab24ba59b39b1bc62d164c3fa03dd53eaf2.pdf http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d3c/cab24ba59b39b1bc62d164c3fa03dd53eaf2.pdf]
		+
		+	* [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780857095091500047 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780857095091500047],
		+	: [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Liu_et_al_2014b https://www.scipedia.com/public/Liu_et_al_2014b],
		+	: [http://che.ufl.edu/orazem/pdf-files/Liu-CPbook-Chap4-2014.pdf http://che.ufl.edu/orazem/pdf-files/Liu-CPbook-Chap4-2014.pdf],
		+	: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/135088014 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/135088014]

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:04, 14 October 2020
(No difference)