<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lin_et_al._2016abca</id>
		<title>Lin et al. 2016abca - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lin_et_al._2016abca"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Lin_et_al._2016abca&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-14T14:05:23Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Lin_et_al._2016abca&amp;diff=9608&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 966841698 to Lin et al. 2016abca</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Lin_et_al._2016abca&amp;diff=9608&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2016-10-04T10:32:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_966841698&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 966841698&quot;&gt;Draft Content 966841698&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Lin_et_al._2016abca&quot; title=&quot;Lin et al. 2016abca&quot;&gt;Lin et al. 2016abca&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 10:32, 4 October 2016&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Lin_et_al._2016abca&amp;diff=9431&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;  '''Purpose:'''  Some studies reported a comparable oncological outcome and better early continence rate of Retzius-preserving robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatec...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Lin_et_al._2016abca&amp;diff=9431&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2016-10-03T13:57:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Purpose:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  Some studies reported a comparable oncological outcome and better early continence rate of Retzius-preserving robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatec...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Purpose:'''  Some studies reported a comparable oncological outcome and better early continence rate of Retzius-preserving robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). We want to compare the early perioperative and continence outcome. And we are also eager to know if the learning curve of Retzius-preserving surgery would compromise the outcome or not?      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Materials and Methods:'''  We selected patient with organ-confined prostate cancer (≤ cT2c), PSA ≤ 40, Gleason score of biopsy ≤ 8, prostate volume ≤ 50 ml and BMI &amp;lt; 35. We design a case control matching study with 20 cases of each Retzius-preserving RALP and conventional RALP group. Postoperative parameter and early continence result was compared.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Results:'''  From Febuary, 2015 to Febuary, 2016, total 84 cases of RALP were performed in VGHTC. Twenty of them underwent Retzius-preserving RALP. There is no statistical difference of preoperative characteristics. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, mean length of hospital stay, intra- and postoperative complication rates, pathological stage of disease, Gleason scores, tumour volumes and positive surgical margins between the conventional RALP and Retzius-sparing RALP groups. However, console time, Vesicourethral anastomosis time were longer for Retzius-sparing RALP. There is no significant difference of early continence at 4 weeks between two groups.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Conclusion:'''  Based on the early result of this study, Retzius-preserving RALP is a feasible and safe treatment choice for localized prostate cancer. Both console time and anastomosis time are favoring to conventional RALP.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>