http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Junqueira_Duarte_2024a 2026-05-16T18:42:19Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Junqueira_Duarte_2024a&diff=300649&oldid=prev 2024-06-06T10:57:23Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_579344983" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 579344983">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 579344983</a> to <a href="/public/Junqueira_Duarte_2024a" title="Junqueira Duarte 2024a">Junqueira Duarte 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:57, 6 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Junqueira_Duarte_2024a&diff=300648&oldid=prev 2024-06-06T10:57:19Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:57, 6 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Assessing soil properties through geotechnical tests is a crucial activity to understand its behaviour. Field tests serve as a good approach to characterize the geotechnical behaviour of materials according to their in-situ condition. However, the interpretation of these tests often relies on empirical correlations, which can become complex when dealing with soils with notable heterogeneity. This paper objective is to determine the strength parameters and discuss the consolidation effects for a heterogeneous tropical soil deposit using data from field tests with different rates of penetration and laboratory tests. A layer identified as low-strength soil classified as silty-sand to silty-clay exhibited partial drainage during a standard-rate cone penetration. The approach proposed by Randolph and DeJong (2012) was used to determine the penetration rate necessary to mobilize an undrained behaviour of the material, since the cone penetration results shown that the material is mostly contractive and clay-like. CPTu tests were also conducted with penetration rates of 60 mm/s and 100 mm/s, to proper estimate the undrained shear strength (Su). These tests reinforced the presence of a preconsolidated upper layer, enabling the estimation for the overconsolidation ratio (OCR). For the normally consolidated portion of the residual soil, rapid tests that achieved a normalized velocity (V) associated with distinctly undrained penetration were used to derive the undrained shear strength (Su), with a cone factor (Nkt) estimated from standard-rate tests available. The geotechnical parameters estimated were then compared to the laboratory data results showing a convergence with the parameters estimated by the field tests.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Assessing soil properties through geotechnical tests is a crucial activity to understand its behaviour. Field tests serve as a good approach to characterize the geotechnical behaviour of materials according to their in-situ condition. However, the interpretation of these tests often relies on empirical correlations, which can become complex when dealing with soils with notable heterogeneity. This paper objective is to determine the strength parameters and discuss the consolidation effects for a heterogeneous tropical soil deposit using data from field tests with different rates of penetration and laboratory tests. A layer identified as low-strength soil classified as silty-sand to silty-clay exhibited partial drainage during a standard-rate cone penetration. The approach proposed by Randolph and DeJong (2012) was used to determine the penetration rate necessary to mobilize an undrained behaviour of the material, since the cone penetration results shown that the material is mostly contractive and clay-like. CPTu tests were also conducted with penetration rates of 60 mm/s and 100 mm/s, to proper estimate the undrained shear strength (Su). These tests reinforced the presence of a preconsolidated upper layer, enabling the estimation for the overconsolidation ratio (OCR). For the normally consolidated portion of the residual soil, rapid tests that achieved a normalized velocity (V) associated with distinctly undrained penetration were used to derive the undrained shear strength (Su), with a cone factor (Nkt) estimated from standard-rate tests available. The geotechnical parameters estimated were then compared to the laboratory data results showing a convergence with the parameters estimated by the field tests.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_57934498357.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:300646:newid:300648 --> </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Junqueira_Duarte_2024a&diff=300646&oldid=prev 2024-06-06T10:57:17Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:57, 6 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Assessing soil properties through geotechnical tests is a crucial activity to understand its behaviour. Field tests serve as a good approach to characterize the geotechnical behaviour of materials according to their in-situ condition. However, the interpretation of these tests often relies on empirical correlations, which can become complex when dealing with soils with notable heterogeneity. This paper objective is to determine the strength parameters and discuss the consolidation effects for a heterogeneous tropical soil deposit using data from field tests with different rates of penetration and laboratory tests. A layer identified as low-strength soil classified as silty-sand to silty-clay exhibited partial drainage during a standard-rate cone penetration. The approach proposed by Randolph and DeJong (2012) was used to determine the penetration rate necessary to mobilize an undrained behaviour of the material, since the cone penetration results shown that the material is mostly contractive and clay-like. CPTu tests were also conducted with penetration rates of 60 mm/s and 100 mm/s, to proper estimate the undrained shear strength (Su). These tests reinforced the presence of a preconsolidated upper layer, enabling the estimation for the overconsolidation ratio (OCR). For the normally consolidated portion of the residual soil, rapid tests that achieved a normalized velocity (V) associated with distinctly undrained penetration were used to derive the undrained shear strength (Su), with a cone factor (Nkt) estimated from standard-rate tests available. The geotechnical parameters estimated were then compared to the laboratory data results showing a convergence with the parameters estimated by the field tests.</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:300645:newid:300646 --> </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Junqueira_Duarte_2024a&diff=300645&oldid=prev 2024-06-06T10:57:15Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez