Johnson 2010a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 14:41, 21 January 2021

2021-01-21T14:41:29Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 480636104 to Johnson 2010a

2020-10-14T13:38:58Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 480636104 to Johnson 2010a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Unmanned Airborne Systems (UAS) offer significant benefits for long duration missions. They can also be used in situations where it is inappropriate to expose..."

2020-10-14T13:38:56Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Unmanned Airborne Systems (UAS) offer significant benefits for long duration missions. They can also be used in situations where it is inappropriate to expose..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Unmanned Airborne Systems (UAS) offer significant benefits for long duration missions. They can also be used in situations where it is inappropriate to expose aircrew to increased levels of risk. Partly in consequence, they continue to experience accident rates that are significantly higher than those for most conventional aircraft. It can also be argued that increased mishap rates are due to lower standards of design and maintenance. UAS are, therefore, largely confined to segregated areas that are well away from other airspace users. There are growing commercial and political pressures for them to be integrated into airspace that is directly under the control of air traffic management. Police agencies would like to deploy miniature UAS in populated areas, for example, to augment conventional helicopter operations. There are proposals to operate unmanned freight operations from existing airports. Longer-term proposals include the use of UAS technology to replace the co-pilot. Automated systems might intervene only if the single human pilot is incapacitated. The following pages focus on the computational issues that form one part of wider set of 'system safety' concerns that must be addressed before UAS operations can be integrated into controlled airspace.

Document type: Part of book or chapter of book

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_480636104-beopen830-5971-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/%7Ejohnson/papers/SAFECOMP2010/CWJ_UAV.pdf http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/%7Ejohnson/papers/SAFECOMP2010/CWJ_UAV.pdf]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 21 January 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Unmanned Airborne Systems (UAS) offer significant benefits for long duration missions. They can also be used in situations where it is inappropriate to expose aircrew to increased levels of risk. Partly in consequence, they continue to experience accident rates that are significantly higher than those for most conventional aircraft. It can also be argued that increased mishap rates are due to lower standards of design and maintenance. UAS are, therefore, largely confined to segregated areas that are well away from other airspace users. There are growing commercial and political pressures for them to be integrated into airspace that is directly under the control of air traffic management. Police agencies would like to deploy miniature UAS in populated areas, for example, to augment conventional helicopter operations. There are proposals to operate unmanned freight operations from existing airports. Longer-term proposals include the use of UAS technology to replace the co-pilot. Automated systems might intervene only if the single human pilot is incapacitated. The following pages focus on the computational issues that form one part of wider set of 'system safety' concerns that must be addressed before UAS operations can be integrated into controlled airspace.		Unmanned Airborne Systems (UAS) offer significant benefits for long duration missions. They can also be used in situations where it is inappropriate to expose aircrew to increased levels of risk. Partly in consequence, they continue to experience accident rates that are significantly higher than those for most conventional aircraft. It can also be argued that increased mishap rates are due to lower standards of design and maintenance. UAS are, therefore, largely confined to segregated areas that are well away from other airspace users. There are growing commercial and political pressures for them to be integrated into airspace that is directly under the control of air traffic management. Police agencies would like to deploy miniature UAS in populated areas, for example, to augment conventional helicopter operations. There are proposals to operate unmanned freight operations from existing airports. Longer-term proposals include the use of UAS technology to replace the co-pilot. Automated systems might intervene only if the single human pilot is incapacitated. The following pages focus on the computational issues that form one part of wider set of 'system safety' concerns that must be addressed before UAS operations can be integrated into controlled airspace.
−
−	~~Document type: Part of book or chapter of book~~
−
−	~~== Full document ==~~
−	~~<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_480636104-beopen830-5971-document.pdf</pdf>~~


Line 15:		Line 10:

	* [http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/%7Ejohnson/papers/SAFECOMP2010/CWJ_UAV.pdf http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/%7Ejohnson/papers/SAFECOMP2010/CWJ_UAV.pdf]		* [http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/%7Ejohnson/papers/SAFECOMP2010/CWJ_UAV.pdf http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/%7Ejohnson/papers/SAFECOMP2010/CWJ_UAV.pdf]
		+
		+	* [http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~johnson/papers/SAFECOMP2010/CWJ_UAV.pdf http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~johnson/papers/SAFECOMP2010/CWJ_UAV.pdf],
		+	: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_11 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_11],
		+	: [http://core.ac.uk/display/22596853 http://core.ac.uk/display/22596853],
		+	: [http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/41633 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/41633],
		+	: [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/safecomp/safecomp2010.html#Johnson10 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/safecomp/safecomp2010.html#Johnson10],
		+	: [https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1886315 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1886315],
		+	: [https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_11 https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_11],
		+	: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1535884405 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1535884405]
		+
		+	* [http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_11 http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_11],
		+	: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_11]

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:38, 14 October 2020
(No difference)