<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Herb_2012a</id>
		<title>Herb 2012a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Herb_2012a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Herb_2012a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-11T12:06:03Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Herb_2012a&amp;diff=183977&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 926889054 to Herb 2012a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Herb_2012a&amp;diff=183977&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-01-25T09:54:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_926889054&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 926889054&quot;&gt;Draft Content 926889054&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Herb_2012a&quot; title=&quot;Herb 2012a&quot;&gt;Herb 2012a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 09:54, 25 January 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Herb_2012a&amp;diff=183976&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot; == Abstract ==  Abstract in English language: Initiatives that are calling for transparency, open and easy access to information (of academic, administrative or any other ori...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Herb_2012a&amp;diff=183976&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-01-25T09:54:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot; == Abstract ==  Abstract in English language: Initiatives that are calling for transparency, open and easy access to information (of academic, administrative or any other ori...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstract in English language: Initiatives that are calling for transparency, open and easy access to information (of academic, administrative or any other origin) are  gaining momentum and are beginning to differentiate more and more. The claims range from Free Access to information to Open Access according to the principles of the Open Source community. Some initiatives focus more on transparency rather than on openness, such as the whistleblower platform Wikileaks, while others (e.g. Open Government and Open Access to Research Data) combine the demands for transparency and openness or focus on the provision of non-proprietary information (like the geodata project OpenStreetMap or Open Metrics concepts in the scientific area). Twelve authors from different Open Data projects and from the context of Open Access to scientific information, Open Science, journalism and law analyze the Open Initiatives and discuss their common limitations as well as radical concepts of Openness such as WikiLeaks and Anonymous.  Abstract in German language:    Initiativen, die Transparenz, offenen und mÃ¶glichst einfachen Zugang zu Informationen, etwa in Wissenschaft und Verwaltung fordern und herstellen, gewinnen rasant an Bedeutung und beginnen sich immer weiter zu differenzieren. Die Forderungen reichen von freiem (im Sinne von kostenlosem) Zugang zu Informationen bis hin zu offenem Zugang analog den Prinzipien der Open Source Community. Manche Initiativen und PhÃ¤nomene fokussieren stÃ¤rker auf Transparenz als auf Offenheit, wie z.B. die Whistleblower-Plattform Wikileaks, wÃ¤hrend wiederum andere (z.B. Open Government oder Open Access zu Forschungsdaten) die Forderungen nach Transparenz und Offenheit kombinieren oder sich an der Bereitstellung nicht-proprietÃ¤rer Informationen versuchen (wie das Geodaten-Projekt OpenStreetMap oder die Open Metrics Konzepte im Wissenschaftskontext). ZwÃ¶lf Autorinnen und Autoren aus Open Data Projekten und aus den Bereichen Open Access, Open Science, Journalismus und Recht beschreiben und analysieren die besagten und andere Open Initiatives, diskutieren deren Gemeinsamkeiten und Grenzen sowie radikale Offenheitskonzepte wie WikiLeaks und Anonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Original document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The different versions of the original document can be found in:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://zenodo.org/record/7211 https://zenodo.org/record/7211] under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://zenodo.org/record/7211 https://zenodo.org/record/7211],&lt;br /&gt;
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7211 http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7211] under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>