http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Hen-Jones_et_al_2024aHen-Jones et al 2024a - Revision history2026-05-11T07:30:57ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Hen-Jones_et_al_2024a&diff=301705&oldid=prevJSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 695682117 to Hen-Jones et al 2024a2024-06-07T10:59:46Z<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_695682117" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 695682117">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 695682117</a> to <a href="/public/Hen-Jones_et_al_2024a" title="Hen-Jones et al 2024a">Hen-Jones et al 2024a</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:59, 7 June 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>JSanchezhttp://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Hen-Jones_et_al_2024a&diff=301704&oldid=prevJSanchez at 10:59, 7 June 20242024-06-07T10:59:38Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:59, 7 June 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The PS logger is a well-established seismic tool for measuring P and S wave velocities in a single borehole, using low frequency indirect excitation originating from a dipole source. Because of its low operating frequency, it is capable of generating seismic waves in slow, unconsolidated materials such as those found in offshore environments where S wave velocity is often used to estimate the small strain stiffness, Gmax (of particular interest to offshore construction). Despite its widespread use, there is no current standard for the use of the PS logger, even though other methods operating on similar principles have well-established reference methodologies and guidelines. As such, PS logger methodology is largely dictated by user manuals written by manufacturers, which likely introduces inconsistencies in operation guidelines, and may impede consistency in data obtained by different users. In this paper, the authors conduct a literature review of existing standards for relevant methods including CPT, SPT, SCPT and downhole and crosshole seismic testing, as well as relevant ground investigation standards, identifying the need for standardisation of the PS logging method. Examination of the current state of standardisation concludes that although existing seismic testing standards could possibly be expanded to include the PS logging method, the differing constraints and operational requirements are such that the development of a specific PS logger testing standard is highly recommended. An initial framework is presented for a PS logger standard, identifying the required components, in terms of borehole requirements, testing procedure, data interpretation and best practice.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The PS logger is a well-established seismic tool for measuring P and S wave velocities in a single borehole, using low frequency indirect excitation originating from a dipole source. Because of its low operating frequency, it is capable of generating seismic waves in slow, unconsolidated materials such as those found in offshore environments where S wave velocity is often used to estimate the small strain stiffness, Gmax (of particular interest to offshore construction). Despite its widespread use, there is no current standard for the use of the PS logger, even though other methods operating on similar principles have well-established reference methodologies and guidelines. As such, PS logger methodology is largely dictated by user manuals written by manufacturers, which likely introduces inconsistencies in operation guidelines, and may impede consistency in data obtained by different users. In this paper, the authors conduct a literature review of existing standards for relevant methods including CPT, SPT, SCPT and downhole and crosshole seismic testing, as well as relevant ground investigation standards, identifying the need for standardisation of the PS logging method. Examination of the current state of standardisation concludes that although existing seismic testing standards could possibly be expanded to include the PS logging method, the differing constraints and operational requirements are such that the development of a specific PS logger testing standard is highly recommended. An initial framework is presented for a PS logger standard, identifying the required components, in terms of borehole requirements, testing procedure, data interpretation and best practice.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_6956821178.pdf</pdf></ins></div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:301702:newid:301704 -->
</table>JSanchezhttp://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Hen-Jones_et_al_2024a&diff=301702&oldid=prevJSanchez at 10:59, 7 June 20242024-06-07T10:59:36Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:59, 7 June 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">                                </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The PS logger is a well-established seismic tool for measuring P and S wave velocities in a single borehole, using low frequency indirect excitation originating from a dipole source. Because of its low operating frequency, it is capable of generating seismic waves in slow, unconsolidated materials such as those found in offshore environments where S wave velocity is often used to estimate the small strain stiffness, Gmax (of particular interest to offshore construction). Despite its widespread use, there is no current standard for the use of the PS logger, even though other methods operating on similar principles have well-established reference methodologies and guidelines. As such, PS logger methodology is largely dictated by user manuals written by manufacturers, which likely introduces inconsistencies in operation guidelines, and may impede consistency in data obtained by different users. In this paper, the authors conduct a literature review of existing standards for relevant methods including CPT, SPT, SCPT and downhole and crosshole seismic testing, as well as relevant ground investigation standards, identifying the need for standardisation of the PS logging method. Examination of the current state of standardisation concludes that although existing seismic testing standards could possibly be expanded to include the PS logging method, the differing constraints and operational requirements are such that the development of a specific PS logger testing standard is highly recommended. An initial framework is presented for a PS logger standard, identifying the required components, in terms of borehole requirements, testing procedure, data interpretation and best practice.</ins></div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:301701:newid:301702 -->
</table>JSanchezhttp://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Hen-Jones_et_al_2024a&diff=301701&oldid=prevJSanchez: Created blank page2024-06-07T10:59:35Z<p>Created blank page</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>JSanchez