http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Gu_et_al_2023a Gu et al 2023a - Revision history 2026-05-11T12:30:32Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Gu_et_al_2023a&diff=284878&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 552940466 to Gu et al 2023a 2023-10-03T11:59:00Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_552940466" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 552940466">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 552940466</a> to <a href="/public/Gu_et_al_2023a" title="Gu et al 2023a">Gu et al 2023a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:59, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Gu_et_al_2023a&diff=284791&oldid=prev JSanchez at 10:48, 3 October 2023 2023-10-03T10:48:44Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:48, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In a particular service environment, the calculation models used to determine the durability of existing concrete structures differ from those employed in the design phase. This paper presents a methodology for assessing the probability durability of existing structures, taking into account the nondestructive testing results and the target reliability index. The initial step involves introducing a correction coefficient into the carbonation and corrosion development theory model. This coefficient is necessary to account for the correction associated with the corrosion monitoring of steel. The values of this coefficient should be determined based on the actual testing results, specifically considering the presence of reinforcing steel corrosion. Next, a probability expression is proposed using the measured results of probability characteristics and the target reliability index. This approach takes inspiration from the design-value method and the existing theory of structure reliability. It also takes into account the specific variables of concrete protective cover thickness and the compressive strength as the fundamental random variables. The residual working life can be calculated as the outcome of a durability assessment through quantitative analysis. This calculation can serve as a valuable reference for the maintenance program.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In a particular service environment, the calculation models used to determine the durability of existing concrete structures differ from those employed in the design phase. This paper presents a methodology for assessing the probability durability of existing structures, taking into account the nondestructive testing results and the target reliability index. The initial step involves introducing a correction coefficient into the carbonation and corrosion development theory model. This coefficient is necessary to account for the correction associated with the corrosion monitoring of steel. The values of this coefficient should be determined based on the actual testing results, specifically considering the presence of reinforcing steel corrosion. Next, a probability expression is proposed using the measured results of probability characteristics and the target reliability index. This approach takes inspiration from the design-value method and the existing theory of structure reliability. It also takes into account the specific variables of concrete protective cover thickness and the compressive strength as the fundamental random variables. The residual working life can be calculated as the outcome of a durability assessment through quantitative analysis. This calculation can serve as a valuable reference for the maintenance program.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_552940466130.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:284789:newid:284791 --> </table> JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Gu_et_al_2023a&diff=284789&oldid=prev JSanchez at 10:48, 3 October 2023 2023-10-03T10:48:42Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:48, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In a particular service environment, the calculation models used to determine the durability of existing concrete structures differ from those employed in the design phase. This paper presents a methodology for assessing the probability durability of existing structures, taking into account the nondestructive testing results and the target reliability index. The initial step involves introducing a correction coefficient into the carbonation and corrosion development theory model. This coefficient is necessary to account for the correction associated with the corrosion monitoring of steel. The values of this coefficient should be determined based on the actual testing results, specifically considering the presence of reinforcing steel corrosion. Next, a probability expression is proposed using the measured results of probability characteristics and the target reliability index. This approach takes inspiration from the design-value method and the existing theory of structure reliability. It also takes into account the specific variables of concrete protective cover thickness and the compressive strength as the fundamental random variables. The residual working life can be calculated as the outcome of a durability assessment through quantitative analysis. This calculation can serve as a valuable reference for the maintenance program.</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:284788:newid:284789 --> </table> JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Gu_et_al_2023a&diff=284788&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2023-10-03T10:48:40Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez