Gao et al 2023a - Revision history

http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Gao_et_al_2023a Gao et al 2023a - Revision history 2026-05-11T18:19:51Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Gao_et_al_2023a&diff=284497&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 458385615 to Gao et al 2023a 2023-10-03T10:01:33Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_458385615" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 458385615">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 458385615</a> to <a href="/public/Gao_et_al_2023a" title="Gao et al 2023a">Gao et al 2023a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:01, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Gao_et_al_2023a&diff=284460&oldid=prev JSanchez at 09:58, 3 October 2023 2023-10-03T09:58:20Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:58, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Evaluating concrete quality and performance, especially determining the resistance of concrete to fluid and ion ingress, is fundamental to estimating concrete’s durability and predicting the service life of concrete structures. Both bulk and surface electrical resistivity tests have gained increasing interest as rapid and repeatable indicators of concrete’s resistance to fluid ingress. In this study, concrete electrical resistivity was measured at the ages of 56 and 91 days on specimens from five concrete mixtures exposed to different curing environments and storage solutions. Both bulk and surface resistivity of concrete in each curing condition are compared, and the effect of curing methods on electrical resistivity is discussed. The results show that conditioning in a highly-conductive storage solution, such as a simulated pore solution, led to a lower concrete resistivity measurement than when stored in saturated limewater. The effect of mixture compositions on measured resistivity revealed that for the same cementitious materials, the electrical resistivity increased as the w/cm ratio decreased, and a linear correlation between the w/cm ratio and concrete electrical resistivity was obtained.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Evaluating concrete quality and performance, especially determining the resistance of concrete to fluid and ion ingress, is fundamental to estimating concrete’s durability and predicting the service life of concrete structures. Both bulk and surface electrical resistivity tests have gained increasing interest as rapid and repeatable indicators of concrete’s resistance to fluid ingress. In this study, concrete electrical resistivity was measured at the ages of 56 and 91 days on specimens from five concrete mixtures exposed to different curing environments and storage solutions. Both bulk and surface resistivity of concrete in each curing condition are compared, and the effect of curing methods on electrical resistivity is discussed. The results show that conditioning in a highly-conductive storage solution, such as a simulated pore solution, led to a lower concrete resistivity measurement than when stored in saturated limewater. The effect of mixture compositions on measured resistivity revealed that for the same cementitious materials, the electrical resistivity increased as the w/cm ratio decreased, and a linear correlation between the w/cm ratio and concrete electrical resistivity was obtained.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_45838561571.pdf</pdf></ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Gao_et_al_2023a&diff=284458&oldid=prev JSanchez at 09:58, 3 October 2023 2023-10-03T09:58:18Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:58, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">                                </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Evaluating concrete quality and performance, especially determining the resistance of concrete to fluid and ion ingress, is fundamental to estimating concrete’s durability and predicting the service life of concrete structures. Both bulk and surface electrical resistivity tests have gained increasing interest as rapid and repeatable indicators of concrete’s resistance to fluid ingress. In this study, concrete electrical resistivity was measured at the ages of 56 and 91 days on specimens from five concrete mixtures exposed to different curing environments and storage solutions. Both bulk and surface resistivity of concrete in each curing condition are compared, and the effect of curing methods on electrical resistivity is discussed. The results show that conditioning in a highly-conductive storage solution, such as a simulated pore solution, led to a lower concrete resistivity measurement than when stored in saturated limewater. The effect of mixture compositions on measured resistivity revealed that for the same cementitious materials, the electrical resistivity increased as the w/cm ratio decreased, and a linear correlation between the w/cm ratio and concrete electrical resistivity was obtained.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Gao_et_al_2023a&diff=284457&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2023-10-03T09:58:17Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez