http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Forestti_et_al_2024a 2026-05-11T12:15:34Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Forestti_et_al_2024a&diff=301487&oldid=prev 2024-06-07T09:35:42Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_556621475" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 556621475">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 556621475</a> to <a href="/public/Forestti_et_al_2024a" title="Forestti et al 2024a">Forestti et al 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:35, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Forestti_et_al_2024a&diff=301486&oldid=prev 2024-06-07T09:35:32Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:35, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Dynamic Penetration Test (DPT) is widely applied for soil field characterization. The technique is usually appreciated as a simple and cost-effective means of determine soil resistance which can be obtained either from Newtonian or from wave equation methods. While wave equation analysis has demonstrated numerous advantages in recent decades, its adoption is constrained by the need for specific instrumentation and more complex analysis. Consequently, the simpler Newtonian analysis, and particularly the Dutch Formula specified by ISO 22476-2, remains the more commonly used approach for routine geotechnical applications. To ensure its accuracy comparing to wave equation-based methods, a field campaigns were conducted on experimental sites with various soil types. The campaigns included Cone Penetration Test (CPT), which is used as a reference tool in this study, and instrumented DPTs allowing easy application of wave equation methods. Results revealed that Dutch Formula resistance values were comparable to both CPT results and those derived from wave equation methods in most cases. In addition, DF variation formula applying energy measurement seemed to underestimate cone resistance in all case examined. The study highlights the importance of applying good practice rules to enhance DPT results</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Dynamic Penetration Test (DPT) is widely applied for soil field characterization. The technique is usually appreciated as a simple and cost-effective means of determine soil resistance which can be obtained either from Newtonian or from wave equation methods. While wave equation analysis has demonstrated numerous advantages in recent decades, its adoption is constrained by the need for specific instrumentation and more complex analysis. Consequently, the simpler Newtonian analysis, and particularly the Dutch Formula specified by ISO 22476-2, remains the more commonly used approach for routine geotechnical applications. To ensure its accuracy comparing to wave equation-based methods, a field campaigns were conducted on experimental sites with various soil types. The campaigns included Cone Penetration Test (CPT), which is used as a reference tool in this study, and instrumented DPTs allowing easy application of wave equation methods. Results revealed that Dutch Formula resistance values were comparable to both CPT results and those derived from wave equation methods in most cases. In addition, DF variation formula applying energy measurement seemed to underestimate cone resistance in all case examined. The study highlights the importance of applying good practice rules to enhance DPT results</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_556621475106.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Forestti_et_al_2024a&diff=301484&oldid=prev 2024-06-07T09:35:29Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:35, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The Dynamic Penetration Test (DPT) is widely applied for soil field characterization. The technique is usually appreciated as a simple and cost-effective means of determine soil resistance which can be obtained either from Newtonian or from wave equation methods. While wave equation analysis has demonstrated numerous advantages in recent decades, its adoption is constrained by the need for specific instrumentation and more complex analysis. Consequently, the simpler Newtonian analysis, and particularly the Dutch Formula specified by ISO 22476-2, remains the more commonly used approach for routine geotechnical applications. To ensure its accuracy comparing to wave equation-based methods, a field campaigns were conducted on experimental sites with various soil types. The campaigns included Cone Penetration Test (CPT), which is used as a reference tool in this study, and instrumented DPTs allowing easy application of wave equation methods. Results revealed that Dutch Formula resistance values were comparable to both CPT results and those derived from wave equation methods in most cases. In addition, DF variation formula applying energy measurement seemed to underestimate cone resistance in all case examined. The study highlights the importance of applying good practice rules to enhance DPT results</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Forestti_et_al_2024a&diff=301483&oldid=prev 2024-06-07T09:35:26Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez