<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Delaisse_et_al_2021a</id>
		<title>Delaisse et al 2021a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Delaisse_et_al_2021a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Delaisse_et_al_2021a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-10T15:07:51Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Delaisse_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=219312&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 347248285 to Delaisse et al 2021a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Delaisse_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=219312&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-03-11T16:13:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_347248285&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 347248285&quot;&gt;Draft Content 347248285&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Delaisse_et_al_2021a&quot; title=&quot;Delaisse et al 2021a&quot;&gt;Delaisse et al 2021a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 16:13, 11 March 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Delaisse_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=219311&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems are frequently solved using partitioned simulation techniques with black-box solvers, reusing reliable and optimized...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Delaisse_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=219311&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-03-11T16:13:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems are frequently solved using partitioned simulation techniques with black-box solvers, reusing reliable and optimized...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems are frequently solved using partitioned simulation techniques with black-box solvers, reusing reliable and optimized codes. These problems can principally be reduced to solving a root-finding problem. In case of strong coupling, pure Gauss-Seidel iterations between the structure and flow solvers are unstable for lower modes. In these cases, quasi-Newton techniques are used, which construct an approximation of the Jacobian or its inverse by reusing information from previous iterations and time steps. Four different quasi-Newton techniques are compared: the interface quasi-Newton algorithm with an approximation for the inverse of the Jacobian from a least-squares model(IQN-ILS), the interface block quasi-Newton algorithm with approximate Jacobians from least-squares models(IBQN-LS), the interface quasi-Newton technique with multiple vector Jacobian(IQN-MVJ) and the multi-vector update quasi-Newton technique(MVQN). These coupling algorithms are differentiated based on whether the approximation of the Jacobian is performed for the entire black-box system (IQN-ILS and IQN-MVJ) or for both individual solvers (IBQN-LS and MVQN). Moreover, a distinction is made between methods which perform the approximation with either least-squares models (IQN-ILS and IBQN-LS) or multivector techniques (IQN-MVJ and MVQN). Their performance is compared by solving a 1D flexible tube case, using the in-house coupling software CoCoNuT. Both the memory usage and number of iterations between structure and flow solvers in each time step are examined. The techniques using a multi-vector approach require explicit matrix construction, so that memory requirements scale quadratically, whereas the least-squares techniques have a matrix-free implementation, resulting in linear scaling. In terms of convergence they are comparable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_347248285p3055.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>