Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 719172841 to Castellano et al 2021b

2021-11-30T13:24:16Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 719172841 to Castellano et al 2021b

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == One of the crucial issues in the still open problem of seismic analyses of masonry constructions is the study of the structural capacity for cyclic..."

2021-11-30T13:24:13Z

Created page with "== Abstract == One of the crucial issues in the still open problem of seismic analyses of masonry constructions is the study of the structural capacity for cyclic..."

New page

== Abstract ==

One of the crucial issues in the still open problem of seismic analyses of masonry
constructions is the study of the structural capacity for cyclic loadings; the difficulties are
even more pronounced when constructions embedding curved elements like arches, vaults and
domes have to be studied. In order to develop effective nonlinear numerical models, the latter
have to be capable of representing the relevant aspects of the experimental behavior, and the
mechanical parameters of the model have to be carefully calibrated with reference to suitable
experimental test results. In this paper the outcomes of experimental tests on a tuff masonry
arch under cyclic loading are proposed and discussed, along with the results of experimental
tests on the masonry materials (blocks and mortar) aimed at determining the compressive,
flexural and shear behavior.

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_719172841p1013.pdf</pdf>
== References ==

[1] Mallardo, V., Malvezzi, R., Milani, E. and Milani, G. Seismic vulnerability of historical masonry buildings: A case study in Ferrara. Eng. Struct. (2008) 30(8):2223-2241.

[2] Lagomarsino, S. Seismic assessment of rocking masonry structures. B. Earthq. Eng. (2015) 1: 97-128.

[3] D’Altri, A.M., Sarhosis, V., Milani, G., Rots, J., Cattari, S., Lagomarsino, S., Sacco, E., Tralli, A., Castellazzi, G. and de Miranda, S. Modeling Strategies for the Computational Analysis of Unreinforced Masonry Structures: Review and Classification. Arch. Comput. Method E. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09351-x.

[4] Pelà, L., Cervera, M. and Roca, P. An orthotropic damage model for the analysis of masonry structures. Constr. Build. Mat. (2013) 41:957-967.

[5] Addessi, D., Marfia, S., Sacco, E. and Toti, J. Modeling approaches for masonry structures. Open Civil Eng. J. (2014) 8(1):288-300.

[6] Lemos, J.V. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures. Int. J. Archit. Herit. (2007) 1(2):190-213.

[7] DeJong, M.J., De Lorenzis, L., Adams, S. and Ochsendorf, J.A. Rocking stability of masonry arches in seismic regions. Earthq. Spectra (2008) 24(4):847-865.

[8] Fraddosio, A., Lepore, N. and Piccioni M.D. Lower Bound Limit Analysis of Masonry Vaults Under General Load Conditions. In: R. Aguilar et al. (Eds.): Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, RILEM Bookseries 18 (2019), pp. 1090-1098.

[9] Ricci, E., Fraddosio, A., Piccioni M.D. and Sacco, E. A new numerical approach fo determining optimal thrust curves of masonry arches. Eur. J. Mech. A-Solid (2019) 75: 426-442.

[10] Fraddosio, A., Lepore, N. and Piccioni M.D. Thrust Surface Method: An innovative approach for the three-dimensional lower bound Limit Analysis of masonry vaults. Eng. Struct. (2020) 202:109846.

[11] Milani, G. and Lourenço, P.B. 3D non-linear behavior of masonry arch bridges. Comput. Struct. (2012) 110-111:133-150.

[12] Chiozzi, A., Milani, G. and Tralli, A. A Genetic Algorithm NURBS-based new approach for fast kinematic limit analysis of masonry vaults. Comput. Struct. (2017) 182:187-204.

[13] De Santis, S., Roscini, F. and de Felice G. Full-scale tests on masonry vaults strengthened with Steel Reinforced Grout. Compos. Part B-Eng. (2018) 141:20-36.

[14] Bove, M., Castellano, A., Fraddosio, A., Scacco, J., Milani, G. and Piccioni M.D. Experimental and numerical analysis of FRCM strengthened parabolic tuff barrel vault. In: A. Di Tommaso et al. (Eds.): Mechanics of Masonry Structures Strengthened with Composite Materials III, Key Engineering Materials 817 (2019), pp. 213-220.

[15] Toti, J., Gattulli, V. and Sacco, E. Damage propagation in a masonry arch subjected to slow cyclic and dynamic loadings. Frattura integr. strutt. (2014) 29:166-177.

[16] Karimi, A.H., Karimi, M.S., Kheyroddin, A. and Shahkarami A.A. Experimental and Numerical Study on Seismic Behavior of An Infilled Masonry Wall Compared to An Arched Masonry Wall. Structures (2016) 8:144-153.

[17] Castellano, A., Fraddosio, A., Scacco, J., Milani, G. and Piccioni M.D. Dynamic response of FRCM reinforced masonry arches. In: A. Di Tommaso et al. (Eds.): Mechanics of Masonry Structures Strengthened with Composite Materials III, Key Engineering Materials 817 (2019), pp. 285-292.

[18] Serpieri, R., Albarella, M. and Sacco E. A 3D microstructured cohesive–frictional interface model and its rational calibration for the analysis of masonry panels. Int. J. Solids Struct. (2017) 122-123:110-127.

[19] Abdou, L., Ami Saada, R., Meftah, F. and Mebarki, A. Experimental Investigations of the Joint-Mortar Behaviour. Mech. Res. Commun. (2006) 33:370-384.

[20] Rinaldin, G., Amadio, C. and Gattesco, N. Review of experimental cyclic tests on unreinforced and strengthened masonry spandrels and numerical modelling of their cyclic behavior. Eng. Struct. (2017) 132:609-623.

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:24, 30 November 2021
(No difference)

Castellano et al 2021b - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 719172841 to Castellano et al 2021b

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == One of the crucial issues in the still open problem of seismic analyses of masonry constructions is the study of the structural capacity for cyclic..."