<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Andres_et_al_2015a</id>
		<title>Andres et al 2015a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Andres_et_al_2015a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Andres_et_al_2015a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-11T09:50:34Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Andres_et_al_2015a&amp;diff=174836&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 445302424 to Andres et al 2015a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Andres_et_al_2015a&amp;diff=174836&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2020-10-14T13:00:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_445302424&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 445302424&quot;&gt;Draft Content 445302424&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Andres_et_al_2015a&quot; title=&quot;Andres et al 2015a&quot;&gt;Andres et al 2015a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:00, 14 October 2020&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Andres_et_al_2015a&amp;diff=174835&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot; == Abstract ==  Policy makers are often confronted with a myriad of factors in the investment decision-making process. This issue is particularly acute in infrastructure inve...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Andres_et_al_2015a&amp;diff=174835&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2020-10-14T13:00:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot; == Abstract ==  Policy makers are often confronted with a myriad of factors in the investment decision-making process. This issue is particularly acute in infrastructure inve...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Policy makers are often confronted with a myriad of factors in the investment decision-making process. This issue is particularly acute in infrastructure investment decisions, as these often involve significant financial resources and lock-in technologies. In regions and countries where the infrastructure access gap is large and pubic budgets severely constrained, the importance of considering the different facets of the decision-making process becomes even more relevant. This paper discusses the trade-offs policy makers confront when attempting to prioritize infrastructure investments, in particular with regard to economic growth and welfare, and proposes a methodological framework for prioritizing infrastructure projects and portfolios that holistically equates such trade-offs, among others. The analysis suggests that it is not desirable to have a single methodology, providing a single ranking of infrastructure investments, because of the complexities of infrastructure investments. Rather, a multidisciplinary approach should be taken. Decision makers will also need to account for factors that are often not easily measured. While having techniques that enable logical frameworks in the decision-making process of establishing priorities is highly desirable, they are no substitute for consensus building and political negotiations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Document type: Book&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_445302424-beopen686-8250-document.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Original document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The different versions of the original document can be found in:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7433]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22855 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22855] under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/75fa/c325846f0023845a31a5c5821802f6b55ca2.pdf http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/75fa/c325846f0023845a31a5c5821802f6b55ca2.pdf]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>