<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Adam_et_al_2021a</id>
		<title>Adam et al 2021a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Adam_et_al_2021a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Adam_et_al_2021a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-14T01:37:01Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Adam_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232995&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 440989978 to Adam et al 2021a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Adam_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232995&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:25:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_440989978&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 440989978&quot;&gt;Draft Content 440989978&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Adam_et_al_2021a&quot; title=&quot;Adam et al 2021a&quot;&gt;Adam et al 2021a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:25, 30 November 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Adam_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232994&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  The bridge over the Quisi Ravine in Alicante Province (Spain), built between 1913  and 1915, consists of six 22-22-42-42-22-22 m long steel Pratt truss spans,...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.colloquiam.com/wd/index.php?title=Adam_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232994&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:25:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  The bridge over the Quisi Ravine in Alicante Province (Spain), built between 1913  and 1915, consists of six 22-22-42-42-22-22 m long steel Pratt truss spans,...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bridge over the Quisi Ravine in Alicante Province (Spain), built between 1913 &lt;br /&gt;
and 1915, consists of six 22-22-42-42-22-22 m long steel Pratt truss spans, the lateral &lt;br /&gt;
spans being isostatic and the central spans continuous. All the joints between the steel &lt;br /&gt;
elements are riveted. As the bridge has been carrying railway traffic for more than 100 &lt;br /&gt;
years, its condition needed to be assessed before carrying out the necessary repairs reinforcement to extend its service life. One of the most interesting tasks on the bridge &lt;br /&gt;
involved a study of its fatigue behaviour to estimate its remaining useful life. Only a few &lt;br /&gt;
kilometres away there happened to be another bridge with identical geometry over the &lt;br /&gt;
Ferrandet Ravine, which had recently been dismantled and taken out of service and had &lt;br /&gt;
carried the same railway traffic as the one over the Quisi Ravine. Advantage was therefore &lt;br /&gt;
taken of this unique opportunity to test one of its isostatic spans in order to extrapolate the &lt;br /&gt;
results to the Quisi Bridge. These tests were carried out at the ICITECH laboratories at the &lt;br /&gt;
Universitat Politècnica de València in two different scenarios: 1) one test on a 22 m span, &lt;br /&gt;
and 2) another on one of its girders, in both of which simulated railway traffic cyclical &lt;br /&gt;
loads were applied. The results allowed us to estimate the number of trains that could &lt;br /&gt;
pass over the bridge and its remaining service life, and also to define a monitoring &lt;br /&gt;
method to help in decision making in case of possible failures of its component parts. &lt;br /&gt;
The study also included an analysis of the bridge’s robustness in local failures of some &lt;br /&gt;
of its elements, which led to a further bridge cyclical loading test with a deliberately &lt;br /&gt;
damaged component. Even though other researchers had previously carried out fatigue &lt;br /&gt;
tests on full-scale riveted bridge elements, the ICITECH study is unique in that it is the &lt;br /&gt;
first time a full-scale bridge has been subjected to fatigue tests. This work was &lt;br /&gt;
accompanied by advanced numerical modelling studies considering the fracture &lt;br /&gt;
mechanics theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_440989978p596.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Pipinato A, Pellegrino C, Bursi OS, Modena C. High-cycle fatigue behavior of riveted  connections for railway metal bridges. J Constr Steel Res 2009;65:2167–75.  doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.019.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Ministerio de Fomento. Instrucción de acciones a considerar en puentes de ferrocarril  (IAPF) 2010:134.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Ministerio de Fomento. Instrucción sobre las inspecciones técnicas en los puentes de  ferrocarril (ITPF-05) 2005:8.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Kühn B, Lukic M, Nussbaumer A, Günther HP, Helmerich R, Herion S, et al.  Assessment of existing steel structures: Recommendations for estimation of the  remaining fatigue life. vol. EUR 23252. Luxembourg: 2008.  doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.057.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] EN 1993-1-9. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures. Part 1-9: Fatigue 2009.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] EAE. Instrucción de Acero Estructural 2011.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Lin S-C, Yang B, Kang S-B, Xu S-Q. A new method for progressive collapse analysis  of steel frames. J Constr Steel Res 2019;153:71–84. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.029.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Buitrago M, Sagaseta J, Adam JM. Effects of sudden failure of shoring elements in  concrete building structures under construction. Eng Struct 2018;172:508–22. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.052.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] Adam JM, Buitrago M, Bertolesi E, Sagaseta J, Moragues JJ. Dynamic performance of  a real-scale reinforced concrete building test under corner-column failure scenario. Eng  Struct 2020.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] Buitrago M, Sagaseta J, Adam JM. Avoiding failures during building construction  using structural fuses as load limiters on temporary shoring structures. Eng Struct 2020;204:1–16.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>